Who Handles Post-Implementation Troubleshooting and Bug Fixes? Uncovering the Responsible Parties

Table of Contents
Software developer coding firewall server on computer and laptop

1. Introduction

Maintaining smooth operations and efficiency post-implementation is paramount. Once an ERP system goes live, unexpected issues can arise, from minor glitches to significant disruptions. 

This section outlines who will tackle these challenges, focusing on the roles and responsibilities involved in post-implementation support. 

1.1. Key Roles for Post-Implementation Troubleshooting 

  • In-House ERP Expert: Understands your specific business needs and can quickly identify and resolve issues.
  • Specialized Consultants: Possess deep technical knowledge to address complex problems effectively.

1.2. Responsibilities and Contributions 

  • Power Users: Frontline support with hands-on experience in system operations.
  • Development Teams: Address software bugs and develop solutions for new requirements.
  • Infrastructure Teams: Handle hardware and network issues impacting ERP performance.
  • Interface Team: Ensure seamless integration with other systems and tools.
Miniature workmen repairing a laptop keyboard

Let’s delve deeper into how each role ensures the stability and continuous improvement of your ERP system.

2. The Cast of Characters: Who’s Involved?

Engineer meeting for architectural project.

During the implementation phase, the consulting firm plays a pivotal role. They bring their expertise to configure the software, conduct testing, and ensure seamless integration with your operations. 

As the system goes live, a transition phase begins. The consulting firm works with your in-house team, led by the ERP point person, to hand over control. This phase is crucial for sustainable system management, with consultants providing continuous support to smooth out any initial kinks. 

2.1. Post-Implementation Support

An in-house ERP point person is indispensable post-implementation. This individual becomes the expert within your organization, overseeing the system’s performance and addressing issues as they arise. Their expertise ensures continuous optimization, aligning with your evolving business processes

  • Troubleshooting: Handles a broad spectrum of issues from minor glitches to significant process improvements.
  • Collaboration: Works closely with other departments and leverages continued support from the consulting firm for complex problems.
change management checklist 48

2.2. Support Teams

Defining the Support Phase 

The support phase begins as the ERP system goes live, lasting several months to a year. This period is critical for resolving initial bugs and issues from real-world use. 

Qualified Staff Are Essential 

A team composed of individuals with relevant skills and experience is crucial. They should be well-versed in the system’s functionalities and capable of handling unexpected challenges swiftly. 

Responsibilities of Power Users 

  • Deep knowledge of the ERP system and its application within business settings.
  • Troubleshooting common issues and providing training.
  • Acting as a bridge between end-users and development or infrastructure teams.

Development Teams 

These teams address complex technical issues and bugs. They write patches or long-term fixes to ensure system stability. 

Infrastructure Teams 

They ensure the underlying hardware and network components run smoothly, monitor server performance, maintain data integrity, and ensure uptime. 

knowledge sharing culture startup

The Interface Team 

  • Coordinates effective communication between all support segments.
  • Manages incident logs and prioritizes issues based on their impact on business processes.

Creating a Dedicated In-House Role 

Many mid-sized companies find it beneficial to create a dedicated in-house role for post-implementation support. This ensures ongoing ownership and aligns ERP functionality with strategic business goals.  

Collaboration with External Experts 

Collaboration with external experts is crucial for addressing complex issues and providing specialized expertise. Partnerships are beneficial for periodic system audits and health checks. 

Ensuring Seamless Knowledge Transfer 

Meticulously planning the transition from external consultants to the in-house team ensures seamless knowledge transfer through detailed documentation, training sessions, and shadowing periods. Continuous learning opportunities for the in-house team enhance their capability in managing the ERP system and adapting to new challenges. 

The success of your ERP system post-implementation relies on the collective effort of these various teams and roles. Establishing a robust support structure is key to reaping the full benefits of your ERP investment. 

3. Categorizing Issues: Types and Priorities

3.1. Technical vs. Non-Technical Issues

Technical Issues 

  • Managed by IT department or ERP vendor support.
  • Involve software functionality, system integrations, performance, and security.
  • Require coding, patch management, or infrastructure adjustments.
How to Handle Tech Issues at Test Center

Non-Technical Issues 

  • Handled by process improvement specialists or in-house ERP experts.
  • Include training gaps, process misunderstandings, and workflow inefficiencies.
  • Require understanding of business processes and tailored training.

Resolution Workflows 

Technical Issues: Follow strict protocols, use ticketing systems, prioritize and assign based on complexity, and document every step. 

Non-Technical Issues: More collaborative and flexible, involving feedback, training sessions, and process documentation, with continuous improvement and user-focused adaptation. 

3.2. Assessing Gravity and Priority

Operational Impact and Urgency 

Prioritize based on how the issue affects daily operations and the urgency of addressing it to prevent additional problems. 

Classifying Requests 

  • Critical: Immediate attention needed (e.g., system outages, major bugs, security breaches).
  • High: Important issues requiring quick resolution (e.g., performance issues, critical feature malfunctions).
  • Medium: Reasonable timeframe for resolution (e.g., minor functional errors, workflow inconsistencies).
  • Low: Minimal operational impact, included in regular maintenance (e.g., minor UI bugs, cosmetic changes).

Systematically classifying requests ensures critical problems are prioritized and less urgent issues are planned for, bolstering operational efficiency and user satisfaction post-implementation.

it outage mistakes

4. Effective Communication: Keeping Everyone in the Loop

4.1. Request Management Statistics

Use data to track corrective measures post-implementation. Utilize dashboards and reporting tools to monitor and improve performance. Key metrics include: 

  • Issue Resolution Time: Measures average time to resolve issues. Lower times indicate efficiency.
  • Customer Satisfaction Scores: User feedback on support quality and timeliness.
  • Number of Issues Reported: Tracks volume of issues over time, indicating improvements or recurring problems.
  • First Contact Resolution Rate: Percentage of issues resolved on the first contact. Higher rates show effective problem-solving.

Regular review of these metrics enhances your support strategy. Sharing these statistics with stakeholders builds credibility and fosters a transparent environment. 

4.2. Multifaceted Communication

Utilize multiple communication channels for post-implementation support: 

  • Email: Ideal for detailed updates and documentation, maintaining a record of decisions and steps taken.
  • Progress Reviews: Regular assessments of implementation effectiveness. Weekly or bi-weekly sessions are recommended based on project scope.
  • Meetings: Both formal and informal meetings, including virtual ones, offer direct communication and quicker resolutions.

Transparency and clarity are crucial: 

  • Transparency: Regular updates and open channels mitigate misinformation and build trust.
  • Clarity: Clear and concise communication prevents misunderstandings. Use standardized templates or consistent formats for updates.

By leveraging these communication strategies, issues are promptly addressed, creating a supportive and informed team environment aimed at a smoothly functioning ERP system.

5. Expertise and Credibility: Demonstrating Competence

5.1. Best Practices

Industry best practices are pivotal for ensuring robust post-implementation support. Here are some proven strategies to enhance your support process: 

  • Clear Ownership and Roles: Designate clear roles within your support team. An in-house ERP point person acts as a coordinator, ensuring issues are promptly addressed.
  • Training and Knowledge Sharing: Foster continuous training and knowledge sharing to keep your team updated with the latest solutions.
tips foster knowledge sharing through online learning communities 1
  • Ticketing System: Implement a robust ticketing system to efficiently track and prioritize issues.
  • Regular Health Checks: Conduct periodic audits to identify and resolve potential issues proactively.
  • Leverage Automation: Use automation tools for routine tasks and real-time monitoring.
  • Stakeholder Communication: Maintain transparent communication with regular updates on issue status and resolution timelines.
  • Feedback Mechanism: Establish a feedback loop to continuously improve support operations.
  • External Expertise: Engage external consultants for complex issues requiring specialized knowledge.

Following these best practices will streamline post-implementation support, enhancing user satisfaction and system efficiency. Industry leaders emphasize similar guidelines for managing post-launch phases. 

5.2. Case Studies

Retail ERP Implementation 

A mid-sized retail company faced inventory mismatches post-ERP implementation, affecting supply chain operations. An in-house ERP point person coordinated with the support team, identifying data migration errors. Data validation checks and re-configured scripts resolved the issues, enhancing operations and accuracy. 

Manufacturing ERP System Upgrade 

A medium-sized manufacturing company faced production schedule syncing issues post-ERP system upgrade. A post-implementation support consultant identified configuration settings as the root cause. Reconfiguring the module and providing targeted training streamlined the sync process, improving overall production efficiency. 

These examples highlight the importance of dedicated individuals and teams in troubleshooting and ensuring long-term ERP system success.

6. Conclusion

6.1. Recap the Critical Roles in Post-Implementation Troubleshooting 

Post-implementation support is crucial for the sustainable success of any ERP system. Key roles include: 

  • ERP Point Person: Primary contact for everyday troubleshooting.
  • Support Teams: Internal IT and external consultants for complex issues.
  • Business Analysts: Identify and prioritize technical impacts on operations.
  • Vendors: Specialized knowledge from software providers or third-party services.

Each role brings unique expertise for comprehensive issue resolution. 

6.2. Encourage Collaboration and Effective Communication Among Stakeholders 

Success relies on collaboration and communication. Key strategies include: 

  • Share Insights: Exchange information on recurring or significant issues.
  • Maintain Open Channels: Keep communication lines open across teams.
  • Utilize Collaborative Tools: Use platforms for real-time communication and ticket tracking.

Fostering collaboration and robust communication ensures a smoother post-implementation phase.

6.3. FAQs 

Q1. Who is responsible for post-implementation troubleshooting and bug fixes?

The responsibility is typically shared among various teams, including support, development, and infrastructure teams, along with power users and potentially external experts.

Q2. What happens during the support phase?

During the support phase, the team addresses any technical and non-technical issues that arise, ensuring the system operates smoothly and effectively.

Q3. What is the role of power users in troubleshooting?

Power users are usually the first line of defense, providing initial support and escalating issues as needed to the appropriate teams.

Q4. How are technical and non-technical issues handled?

Technical issues are generally managed by the development and infrastructure teams, while non-technical issues are addressed by power users and other relevant staff.

Q5. What if the issue is complex and requires external expertise?

Collaboration with external experts may be necessary for complex issues, ensuring a seamless knowledge transfer to internal teams.

Q6. How are issues categorized and prioritized?

Issues are classified based on their operational impact and urgency. Understanding the priority helps in addressing them efficiently.

Q7. Why is effective communication important post-implementation?

Keeping everyone in the loop through multifaceted communication strategies ensures transparency and swift resolution of issues.

Q8. How can mid-sized companies manage post-implementation support?

Creating a new role or hiring internally for dedicated post-implementation support can be effective for mid-sized companies.

Q9. What are best practices for post-implementation support?

Best practices include having a dedicated support team, ensuring continuous training, and fostering collaboration among all stakeholders.

Q10. Can you provide examples of successful post-implementation support?

Yes, case studies such as retail ERP implementation and manufacturing ERP system upgrades demonstrate effective post-implementation strategies.